Publications

  • All of the submitted papers are subject to strict review process by at least two independent reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  • The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, significance, originality, readability and language.
  • The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection. The rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  • Articles may be rejected without review if they are obviously not suitable for publication.
  • If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  • The conference will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively without personal criticism of the author.
  • Manuscripts received for review are treated as confidential documents and are reviewed by anonymous staff.
  • The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  • Submitting the same manuscript to more than one publication concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior.
  • All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.